Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - placidstorm

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 25
17
I was jus lookin at that lol . Nice 1 Irene .

20
Projects and Objects Examples / Re: TLP Project - Ina-like Features
« on: March 01, 2012, 07:51:37 pm »
Yup , slope related .  South Mastiff has a lot of that kinda stuff at a few diff. light angles . As whatever it is ( impact related dust flowing down the slope , melt , lava ) is everywhere on slopes . And is quite hypnotizing on the lower angled , darker pics .

21
Projects and Objects Examples / Re: TLP Project - Ina-like Features
« on: March 01, 2012, 05:28:24 pm »
looks like the side of a hill but can't tell without an Act link .

22
Moon Zoo Object Collections / Re: Crater chains
« on: February 29, 2012, 10:10:20 pm »

23
Projects and Objects Examples / Re: JFincannon's Collapsed Voids
« on: February 29, 2012, 08:28:24 pm »

24
Moon Zoo Object Collections / Re: Crater Questions
« on: February 29, 2012, 12:39:06 am »
Thank you Jules ,
  Although I wouldn't bad mouth scientist by calling me 1  ;D . Then again , I always did say you can call me anything 'sept late for supper  ;) .

26
Projects and Objects Examples / Re: BOULDER EXPLOSIONS!
« on: February 28, 2012, 09:06:50 pm »
This looks to be possibly slope related . Lower tier , South inside slope of Pythagoras .

Act http://target.lroc.asu.edu/da/qmap.html?mv=eqc&mcx=-1893916.54484&mcy=1883602.92543&mz=16

With a better view about 1/3 the way up this Nac http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc/view_lroc/LRO-L-LROC-3-CDR-V1.0/M122625932LC


And what looks to be a good example of a " Creeping " / degrading boulder in the top left .

27
Projects and Objects Examples / Re: BOULDER EXPLOSIONS!
« on: February 28, 2012, 08:21:55 pm »
In the Southwest corner of Pythagoras , on the lower tier of the inside slope you'll find 2 examples I thought to be interesting .



Act http://target.lroc.asu.edu/da/qmap.html?mv=eqc&mcx=-1997039.67059&mcy=1911766.10283&mz=14
1/4 the way up on this Nac http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc/view_lroc/LRO-L-LROC-3-CDR-V1.0/M160398357RC

In example 1. The two halves appear to be a good match for a whole , given the concave feature of the top boulder . With more degradation it may resemble a larger than normal rubble pile .
 1.


In example 2. It appears the boulder shed 2 smaller pieces , that after more degradation could also appear to be a larger that normal rubble pile .
 2.


In both examples it appears that the fractured pieces fell off and rolled ( 1/4 the circumference in example 1 ) and a bit more in example 2 .

I also note that both tracks here , have fewer impacts than our primary example .

Since "Walking boulder" is already taken maybe we could call these (Creeping boulders) , as they creep along as larger pieces degrade into smaller pieces over time

28
Moon Zoo Object Collections / Re: Ray Crater exclusion zone
« on: February 27, 2012, 05:27:33 pm »
Rock slide

Act http://target.lroc.asu.edu/da/qmap.html?mv=eqc&mcx=-832686.19818&mcy=240956.989&mz=15




Nice crater - the link works fine in Chrome but not in Firefox or Safari!

Sorry , should of clarified that . It's the act link to kodemunkeys previous post of an exclusion zone showing it is not a exclusion zone but rubble

29
Moon Zoo Object Collections / Re: Crater Questions
« on: February 27, 2012, 05:17:18 pm »
Revisitation of past mistakes .

Back in August of 2 ought 11 a post was made by Tom128 http://forum.moonzoo.org/index.php?topic=4.msg10868#msg10868 to which I responded to http://forum.moonzoo.org/index.php?topic=4.msg10870#msg10870 and Ireneant responded back to http://forum.moonzoo.org/index.php?topic=4.msg10894#msg10894 .

The topic was melt flow features ( of which I knew nothing about ) and related impacts ( that were nether impacts , or related ) but that didn't stop me , I had crayon in hand and was off to the races .
The pic in question .


And the polite response .


To which I never got back too . ( mistake #1 ) However in my defense , at the time I did not think I could muster an appropriate response inside of a week if at all and not massacre the attempt .
In the picture above I marked 3 craters thinking they caused all this and then were backfilled with material . ( mistake #2 ) As you can clearly see in the picture below I marked everything but a crater .

And as you can also clearly see I did not provide an ample picture to see the whole of the melt pond (mistake #3) expecting she knew every crater by heart (mistake #4) . A slightly broader picture may have lent light my observation . ( which she correctly guessed at anyway ) .
Such as this .

Nac http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc/view_lroc/LRO-L-LROC-3-CDR-V1.0/M143641913RC left side
http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc/view_lroc/LRO-L-LROC-3-CDR-V1.0/M143641913LC right side

So , you may ask " What did a five sandwich eating hillbilly like placidstorm learn from this ? "
Well , from hanging with smart folks , through forums , podcasts , smart folks links and such ...
#1. First and foremost if you're a hillbilly like me get a browser that comes with SPELLCHECK . I'm pretty sure I've poked someone's eye out by now .
#2. If a scientist opens a dialog with you its rude not to respond ( even if you're a dummy , like me ) .
#3. If you're trying to sell a point , look at it from all the angles you can . (There is almost always more to the picture) .
#4. Take all the advice a scientist gives you . ( they really are smarter than a fifth grader ) .

Some of this stuff sticks out like sore thumb after 9 months on the moon , others .... not so much . 9 months ago I'd say " Moon ? Yea we got one but moonless nights make for better hunting the next morning ."  ::)




30
Moon Zoo Object Collections / Re: Crater chains
« on: February 27, 2012, 02:55:32 pm »

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 25